Guidr

Adopt anything.

Every company uses the same software differently. Guidr learns how yours does, then teaches your team inside the apps, step by step.

Someone asks how to create a job code. Guidr's pointer moves to the estimate number field, explains why finance needs it, and waits.

It's never a technical problem.

The same questions, over and over, from people who already sat through the training. The recording went out. Nobody watched it. They went back to asking the person next to them, because that's the only thing that has ever worked.

How do I create a job code?

How do I invoice this client?

Where's that button?

Teach it once.

Show Guidr what your team needs to know: your migration guide, your process docs, your workflows. It remembers how your company does it.

It teaches everyone.

They hold two keys and ask, in their own words. Guidr answers out loud while its pointer moves to the exact button, says what that field does and why your company does it that way, then waits while they do it.

You see who's learned it.

Not how many questions got asked. How many people can now do it without asking.

A real task, start to finish. Sound on.

Showing someone where to click isn't teaching.

Point at a button and they'll finish the task. They'll also be back tomorrow, because following instructions isn't the same as knowing.

That's why Guidr explains as it goes. And after the second time, it stops explaining unless asked.

A good teacher becomes unnecessary.

First time

Second time

Third time

The manual doesn't know about your job codes.

Generic AI can tell you what a button does. It can't know your team files under the client's estimate number, that finance signs off first, or that "brief" means something specific here. Guidr learns your version.

Nothing to author. Nothing to maintain.

Old adoption tools made you build every walkthrough by hand, then rebuild it each time a vendor moved a button. Companies hired people whose only job was keeping them alive. Guidr reads the screen instead, so there's nothing to break.

Learned, not just used.

24 of 31 people can now create a job code on their own. Six days, on average, to get there.

Most software reports how much you used it. Guidr reports how many people stopped needing it.

See what your team is stuck on. Never who.

Group totals only, nothing below ten people, no names. Not a policy you could talk us out of, either: under EU rules, monitoring individual performance would make this a regulated system. We built Guidr so it can't.

One program. Two weeks. A number you pick.

Pick the software that's hurting. We learn it with you. You name the number that should move: seat activation, ramp time, support tickets. Two weeks later you see whether it did.

Questions

No. It shows, they click. People only learn it if their own hand does it.

The opposite. After the second time, Guidr stops explaining unless asked.

No. Typing works exactly the same way, which matters in an open-plan office.

Fine. Show us what you have and tell us which tasks matter. Or give us nothing and start with a fifteen-minute call.

Yes. Arabic and English, including switching between them mid-sentence.

Today, yes. Windows is next.

The screen is captured only when someone presses the hotkey, never in the background. We don't store screenshots or recordings. Our AI providers process them under zero-retention terms. Who touches what, and for how long, is on our trust page.

No, and it's built so it can't be. See “What you see” above.

Book a demo

Tell us which software is hurting. We'll come back with a time.

No newsletter. No follow-up sequence.